The 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos laid bare a truth that too often goes unspoken: the world’s economic architecture is fragmenting even as global challenges converge. The annual meeting shone a light on tensions that matter deeply to emerging markets like Nigeria, including inequality, artificial intelligence, social enterprise, Africa’s young population outlook, the tangles of energy transitions, and the dynamics of global trade.
For decades, the town of Davos-Klosters in Switzerland has been the global destination where geopolitical rivalry, market optimism and economic strategy intersect. In 2026, amid competing national interests and shifting priorities, those conversations have taken on new exigency. What was once technocratic and recondite is now existential for many countries grappling with domestic instability and global uncertainty, and Nigeria is among them.
One striking feature of Davos 2026 was the nuanced discussion on energy. Gone was the simplistic binary between fossil fuels and clean energy; in its place was a recognition that the transition is neither linear nor equitable. It is imperative to note that China defended its wind power strategy after Trump’s criticism at the annual meeting in Davos. Leaders from major economies, including voices defending wind power amid geopolitical friction, underscored the complexity of balancing energy security with decarbonisation.
This is crucial for Nigeria. The country remains one of Africa’s largest oil producers, yet its own population struggles with access to energy. The oil that fuels the nation’s exports does little to power its homes or businesses. Only 45 per cent of Nigerians are connected to the national grid, and even then, electricity is unreliable nearly 85 per cent of the time, while some regions receive almost no power at all.
At Davos, the discourse shifted towards “just transitions”, frameworks that recognise the social and economic dimensions of shifting from fossil fuels to cleaner sources. If clean energy is to evade the fate of Davos fancy words, it must be grounded in real policies that prioritise economic inclusion and energy accessibility. For Nigeria, this means challenging the assumption that oil exports are the sole pillar of future growth.
Policymakers at home should take note that investing in a diversified energy portfolio that includes renewables, gas, and grid infrastructure will yield greater societal benefits than clinging to old models simply because they are familiar.
One of the most candid moments of this year’s forum came not from technocrats but from global investors warning about AI’s impact on inequality. BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink, cautioned that artificial intelligence, despite its promise, risks concentrating wealth and opportunity among those who already have power, aggravating the very divides that undermine social cohesion.
This should resonate loudly in Nigeria, where inequality is stark. Young people face limited employment opportunities, informal work is pervasive, and access to quality education and digital skills remains uneven. A globally competitive economy that ignores these divides risks instability at home even as it seeks investment abroad.
The call from voices at Davos was clear. Inclusive growth must be embedded in economic strategies, not appended as an afterthought. For Nigeria, with Africa’s youngest population and a demographic dividend that could be a catalyst for growth, the path forward lies not in maximising GDP alone but in ensuring that growth translates to real opportunities for its youth.
Perhaps the most tangible indicator of Nigeria’s evolving global stance was the launch of Nigeria House Davos, the country’s first official pavilion on the Davos Promenade, designed to model reforms and attract foreign direct investment.
This initiative, from a good viewpoint, symbolises strategic messaging and a willingness to engage proactively with the global economy on Nigeria’s own terms. Vice President Kashim Shettima, ahead of the forum, emphasised that the pavilion would unify the government, private sector and civil society to present Nigeria as an investable, reform-driven economy.
Yet, global forums should not be reduced to diplomacy and photo-ops. The real prize for Nigeria lies in converting Davos connections into sustained partnerships, particularly in sectors where the country has latent competitive strength, such as agriculture, digitisation, and energy infrastructure.
Furthermore, when U.S. President Donald Trump invited 51 countries to participate in his proposed “Board of Peace for Gaza” ahead of the Davos summit, not a single African country, including Nigeria, made the list. The omission was telling. It reflected how African nations are still too often perceived as peripheral players in global decision-making, invited to observe outcomes rather than shape them. The reasons are uncomfortable but familiar, including inconsistent foreign policy positioning, weak diplomatic leverage, and domestic governance challenges, which undermine credibility abroad. For Nigerian and African leaders, Davos 2026 should be a reminder that global relevance is built long before invitations are sent out.
The lessons from Davos are unmistakable:
Energy strategy must be inclusive and pragmatic. Nigeria cannot afford to outsource its energy future to ideological purity. A mix of cleaner fuels, expanded renewable capacity, and grid resilience should be central to policy.
Inequality is both a social and economic risk. Bridging gaps in education, digital access and labour markets will determine whether technological change becomes a force for broad prosperity or a catalyst for further division.
Global engagement must produce domestic value. Nigeria House Davos should be a hub for translating global partnerships into job creation, technology transfer and sustainable investment flows, not props set.
At Legit.ng’s Business Desk, we’ve been tracking how these global trends intersect with Nigeria’s economic trajectory. We see that Nigeria’s challenges are not unique, but neither are its opportunities. What Davos 2026 highlighted, above all, is that nations are no longer passive recipients of global shifts; they are participants whose strategic choices today will determine their place in tomorrow’s world.
- Felix Imoh is the Public Relations Manager of Legit.ng
Read the full article here
